JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 11, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alexei Egor Julio Estrada

✓Claimant Nancy Lucero Fonseca Bustacara

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Alcance de la causal “desconocimiento de la jurisprudencia”
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto no existió vulneración del debido proceso por desconocimiento del precedente constitucional y se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
Nulidad Contra Sentencias Proferidas Por Salas De Revision
  • Presupuestos formales y materiales de procedencia
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Nulidad de la Sentencia T-225/12. la representante legal de la empresa ARDCO CONSTRUCCIONES LTDA sustentó la solicitud de nulidad en el desconocimiento del precedente constitucional.

La Sala concluye que, la sentencia citada por la solicitante del incidente, al no ser proferida por la Sala Plena de la Corporación, no puede considerarse como precedente constitucional vinculante, cuyo desconocimiento pudiera dar lugar a la configuración de la causal alegada.

En este sentido, se DENIEGA el recurso impetrado..

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-225 de 2012 proferida por la Sala Octava de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.